Case Summary
The Complaint alleged that on January 11, 2022, Respondent conducted court proceedings via livestream video. After court had adjourned, Respondent, while still on the bench, mistakenly believed that the livestream had ended and initiated a conversation with two Assistant State’s Attorneys and an Assistant Public Defender. Through the course of that conversation, Respondent made derogatory, injudicious, and demeaning statements about two attorneys who had appeared before him that day.